While I was reading the article, I couldn’t help making clear connections between Catlette and Hadden’s recommendations for fostering a productive, vibrant and fulfilling work environment and what I know to be effective for employee-driven corporate responsibility (CSR) efforts. While the words “corporate responsibility” never appear in this article, the connection is implied: a company that cares about its employees and respects them as individuals will undoubtedly respect the ecosystem of stakeholders in which it conducts business.
I particularly appreciate the way Catlette and Hadden reframe the social contract between employer and employee as one based on optimism, empathy, opportunity, and collaboration. They rightly assert that, “you are likely to get just the kind of behavior from employees that you expect.” What is harder for many companies to see is how such expectations are institutionalized. As an employee, it can be very confusing when the message from the top is motivating and encouraging, but the policies and practices of everyday employment are restricting and limiting. In sum, employees will “either live up or down to your expectations because your policies, procedures, and employment practices had at their bedrock those same assumptions [about employees as either opportunities or liabilities]”.