Employee Engagement and Corporate Success Factors

Employee Engagement and Corporate Success Factors

Celebrating Pro Bono Week 2014

Multimedia from this Release

Thursday, October 23, 2014 - 7:30am

CAMPAIGN: Common Impact Pro Bono Week 2014


Posted by Dana Yonchak, Common Impact

I’m always interested in learning different perspectives about skilled volunteering and the value that is defined and delivered by these programs.

For a view from the corporate executive perspective, I turned to Jacques Ouimet, VP of Global End Users Technology Services at Manulife Financial. Manulife operates as John Hancock  in the U.S. (disclosure: Jacques is also a Common Impact board member.) We discussed how success is defined and what is needed to achieve strategic talent and employee engagement goals. Here are a few excerpts. Enjoy reading and please add your thoughts and comments!

DY:  What key value is returned to a company, volunteer participant and a nonprofit in an employee engagement-skilled volunteering initiative?

  • Value to the company: In my company, employee engagement is important and is measured on a frequent and consistent basis. We have seen employee engagement scores increase for those employees that are engaged in skilled volunteering projects. This commitment to skilled volunteering also distinguishes the company. Competition for talent is fierce; but when a company can show and prove its social commitment and achieve its objectives through the direct impact of employees, both company and employees become more deeply engaged.
  • Value to the participant: Common Impact develops programs for employees to “learn by doing,” and provides opportunities to practice and expand skills in a nonprofit business setting. These active learning projects also broaden employees’ perspectives, and create opportunities to practice innovation. Ultimately, the opportunity to engage with colleagues from across the company, to learn in a dynamic setting, and to partner with a successful, growing nonprofit to directly impact its future are compelling motivators for participants.
  • Value to the nonprofit: In these types of projects, nonprofits often achieve more than simply the delivery of “x” project. There is clear value in the project deliverable: be it a new website, integration of Salesforce, development of new tools, etc. But there is also a relationship that is formed between the nonprofit and volunteer team that often lasts long after the engagement is complete. Nonprofits can also glean practical skills and practices from a group of colleagues who use a consistent set of process and project management techniques. 

DY:  What 5 steps are needed for a company to succeed in creating an integrated, strategic employee engagement-volunteering initiative?

  • The company must have executive level sponsorship/commitment.
  • Ideally, all layers of management are committed.
  • The company must recognize this commitment and make it part of performance or management objectives. There has to be a link to career development, performance objectives and/or opportunities for promotion.
  • The company must provide/support flexibility to employees for their time. While employees are expected to do projects on their own time, companies can offer time flexibility to support overall employee success.
  • Ideally, skilled volunteering programs are fully integrated in the company’s learning and development initiatives (for example, HR is involved, business unit leaders help develop learning curriculum, etc.)

DY:  In your opinion, what makes Common Impact employee engagement programs unique?
JO:   Common Impact programs have a unique structure and process methodology. Projects are carefully scoped with nonprofit partners, and managed by Common Impact to ensure that engagements are manageable and designed to succeed for all stakeholders. The fact that company volunteer teams are often cross-functional, but always from the same company also provides advantages to programs that feature skilled volunteers from different companies—onboarding and process management are more streamlined and efficient.

DY:  What one word comes to mind when thinking of Common Impact?
JO:  “Ingenious.” When I first heard of and learned how this model worked, I thought, ingenious.


Dana Yonchak
+1 (617) 868-1832
Common Impact